Here's two relatively new case in points:
1. New SAP BW Benchmark
SAP just posted a new benchmark for 500 million records running SAP BW Enhanced Mixed Load (BW EML). The OS was IBM i 7.1, using DB2 for i 7.1 with SAP NetWeaver 7.30. And the hardware: IBM Power System 750 Express Server with 4 processors, 32 cores, 128 threads, a 4.06 GHz POWER7+ processor, 32 KB(D) + 32 KB(I) L1 cache and 256 KB L2 cache per core, 10 MB L3 cache per core, and 512 GB main memory.
With this configuration, IBM achieved 66,900 ad-hoc navigation steps per hour.
This compares quite favorably -- if not exceeds -- a year-older SAP HANA set up that utilizes two x86-based HP servers, one for the database and one for application, running SUSE Linux. What's interesting here is how the dual-server setup compares to the single-server Power 750 -- and how the pricing and management efforts might shake out using the two different methods to deliver SAP solutions. (Incidentally, the dual x86 server setup ran against a billion records.)
2. The Cost/Benefit Case for SAP Business All-in-One Deployments on IBM i and Power Systems
Meanwhile, back to the cost and benefits of IBM i with SAP . . . an International Technology Group white paper takes a closer look at the architecture of an IBM i-based system and applies it to SAP and the cost to manage a deployment over three years. Basically, no surprise here for IBM i aficionados: While x86-based systems often start out cheaper, over three years the cost of the x86-based system gets dangerously close to twice as much as the IBM i on Power setup.
What's crazy to see is that the IBM i-based hardware & maintenance cost is less, the software licensing is less, the software support is less, the facilities cost is less, and of course, the personnel costs are far less -- ITG breaks it all out . . . and then goes quite a bit farther.
If you want to understand the benefits of IBM i on Power -- even if you're not considering SAP -- the ITG white paper isn't a bad place to start. And if you are looking at SAP and IBM i . . . again, put the white paper on your must-read list.